1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099-A
On February 7, 2023, LPA conducted a follow-up investigation visit. Follow-up interviews were conducted with staff members S2 and S3 as well as with administrator.
Regarding the allegation that Uncleared staff are providing care and supervision to residents, the following has been determined: During both visits, all staff members present were found to be adequately cleared and associated in Guardian. Interviews conducted confirmed the identity of other scheduled staff members who were not present at the time of the visit but were also confirmed to be cleared and associated. The allegation is therefore found to be unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Facility administrator is absent from the facility, the following has been determined: During both visits, interviews and a review of staff schedules on file confirmed the daily presence of administrator for at least two to three hours, often more, depending on the established needs at the time. During both visits, Administrator was able to come to the facility under short notice and assist with the investigation's requests.The allegation is therefore found to be unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Regarding the allegation that Staff is not wearing masks while providing care and supervision a the facility, the following has been determined: During both visits, staff members and administrator were observed wearing masks already at the onset of the visits and continuously throughout the LPA's presence at the facility over several hours. The allegation is therefore found to be unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided and left at the facility. |