1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that on February 3, 2025, a resident called for assistance with using the restroom, had to wait an hour because there was only staff to assist all three floors of assisted living due to another staff calling out, and there have been multiple instances where wait times for assistance were up to 30 minutes. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents present, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA tested the call system in three separate resident rooms and observed that a caregiver responded each time in less than five minutes. LPA reviewed the facility’s staff schedule and noted that on February 3, 2025, there were two caregivers for the morning shift, three caregivers for the afternoon shift, and two caregivers for the overnight shift scheduled for all three floors of the assisted living section. Per the facility’s resident roster, the facility had 70 residents in assisted living on February 3, 2025. LPA interviewed COO, who denied that any staff called out on February 3, 2025. LPA reviewed the facility’s payroll records and confirmed that all staff scheduled to work on February 3, 2025, signed in to work that day. LPA interviewed two staff, one of whom admitted that on February 3, 2025, a caregiver was running an hour late so there was only one caregiver for all of assisted living, a resident called for assistance and was advised to wait because there is only one caregiver for assisted living, the caregiver went to the resident’s room and advised the resident they were the only caregiver and they had to assist other residents who had called first but that they would be back, and it is unknown how long the resident had to wait in total. LPA reviewed the facility’s call system logs which do not properly document this incident, as the response time indicated does not specify if it is for the time the phone call was answered, the caregiver was first sent to the resident’s room but did not provide the requested care, or the resident finally received care, meaning the facility does not have any documentation of how long the resident had to wait for care. LPA interviewed 12 residents, 11 of whom stated that response times are generally 10 minutes or less. However, one resident corroborated that wait times for care can be up to 45 minutes. LPA reviewed the facility’s call system logs which do corroborate that wait times can be up to an hour on occasion. The information obtained corroborated the allegation, as the facility was unable to provide timely care to a resident because of short staffing.
During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative. |