1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with R1 revealed that they do not have any evidence to share with LPA and that they sent the Department everything they already had obtained. LPA reviewed the evidence that was previously sent to the Department and found alleged forged signatures. LPA was unable to determine what the alleged forged signatures were for and if they were in fact not R1s signatures. LPA did not observe conservator papers for R1.
Interviews with W1 revealed that they did not know much about the complaint and referred to R1 for evidence and details of the allegations.
Interviews with AD revealed that they did not forge the signatures and R1 was handling their own money and social security benefits.
Based on information gathered and interviews conducted the Department is unable to ascertain if the above mentioned complaint allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred: therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.
|