1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (... continued) Interviews with three of three residents confirm that they have never encountered pest within the facility. Two of three residents reported they had heard of R1 reported infestation but had never observed any pest themselves. Interviews with two of two med-techs reported that R1 complained about pest bites however med-techs denied observing bites on R1. R1 was assessed by their physician and prescribed cream to assist with itching. Prescription forms provided by physician do not list any diagnoses or report of pest bites. Interviews with staff and residents indicated R1 had a dog, however the dog normally appeared well groomed and maintained and did not itch or scratch. LPA toured the room and observed no evidence of fleas or mites.
Therefore based on LPA Tea's observation and interviews conducted and records review the allegation the staff are not properly addressing pest infestation has been determined to be unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No deficiencies cited and an exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Justine Ortiz and a copy of the report was provided to the facility. |