| LPA confirmed R1 and R2 require incontinence care assistance from facility staff. LPA interviewed residents but was unable to determine frequency of incontinence services.
Regarding the allegation the Ombudsman poster is not posted in the facility, LPA Alvaro Ramirez confirmed via photograph taken that Ombudsman poster was not properly posted in a visible location. While the facility was observed to have a poster present in the building, poster was observed laying on an end table in facility living room.
Regarding the allegation Facility did not administer medications to resident, LPA confirmed Resident 3 (R3)’s medication was being rationed by facility staff due to pharmacy failing to provide refill for prescription on time. LPA spoke with Administrator Brevet Dao who stated she did reach out to the pharmacy once notified the pharmacy failed to refill medication on time. R3’s physician was not notified of the missed medication dosages.
It was alleged resident was not given an admission agreement due to R3 not receiving an admission agreement. LPA interviewed R3 who confirmed they did not receive a copy of admission agreement upon moving in. R3 reported they were provided an Admission Agreement on 3/04/23 by Administrator Dao for signature. R3 moved into the facility on 12/18/2021.
Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, the allegations that Facility is malodorous; Ombudsman poster is not posted in facility; Residents are not provided adequate bedding; Facility did not administer medications to resident; and Resident was not given an admission agreement are determined to be Substantiated.
The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit.
* Due to technical difficulties LPA was unable to print document, document emailed to Administrator
|