1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Three of three residents interviewed denied the facility being malodorous or the floors being sticky. During interview, Staff 2 (S2) stated they heard that prior to their employment, the facility had smelled of urine, and the floors had been dirty, however, stated they never observed the floors were dirty or the facility to smell of urine and stated they maintain the facility floor clean and odor free. During interview, S3 denied the facility smelling of urine or the facility floors being dirty. Per S3, the facility used to smell of “chlorine” and floor cleanliness has been and continues to be maintained. During the course of the investigation, LPA noted the facility was odorless and the tile flooring was free of any stickiness, smearing, smudging, or discoloration.
Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations, “Staff sexually abused a resident while in care, Staff handled a resident in a rough manner, Staff hit a resident with objects, Facility is malodorous, and Facility floors are dirty”. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection. |