1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Document review revealed an incomplete eviction notice was served to R1’s family on August 14, 2025. The eviction notice failed to include the following regulation requirements of Section 87224 of Title 22:
• Resources available to assist in identifying alternative housing and care options which include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Referral services that will aid in finding alternative housing. 2) Case management organizations which help manage individual care and service needs.
• A statement informing residents of their right to file a complaint with the licensing agency, as specified in Section 87468, subsection (a)(4), including the name, address, and telephone number of the nearest office of community care licensing and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman office.
• If you object to this move, you have a right to file a complaint with the licensing agency, as specified in CCR 87468.1(a)(4)
• As specified in Health and Safety Code Section 15696.683(a)(4): "In order to evict a resident who remains in the facility after the effective date of the eviction, the residential care facility for the elderly must file an unlawful detainer action in superior court and receive a written judgment signed by a judge. If the facility pursues the unlawful detainer action, you must be served with summons and complaint. You have the right to contest the eviction in writing and through a hearing."
Based on the evidence gathered through interviews and document review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |