1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On July 24, 2025, at approximately 11:05 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA Haddadin was greeted by Administrator (AD) Khatera Bahadory, who granted entry and was advised of the visit's purpose. During the inspection, the LPA toured the premises, interviewed relevant parties, and reviewed facility records, including those pertaining to Resident R1. The allegation under investigation was that the facility issued an unlawful eviction notice to R1. four out four residents and staff interviewed denied allegations. Also,the investigation revealed that on March 31, 2025, the facility provided R1 with a proper 60-day written notice of a rate increase, scheduled to take effect on June 1, 2025. During an interview with the LPA, R1 confirmed receipt of the notice but stated they had confused the rate increase notification with an eviction notice. Furthermore, a review of facility records indicated that R1 had failed to pay rent for March, April, and May of 2025, which was prior to the effective date of the rate increase. Due to this continued nonpayment, the facility issued a 30-day eviction notice to R1 on July 11, 2025. The LPA reviewed this eviction notice and verified that its issuance complied with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. Based on observations, interviews, and the information gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the allegation that the facility issued an unlawful eviction is deemed UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means the evidence indicates the charge is false, could not have happened, or is without a reasonable basis. Accordingly, the department has dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.
*****AMENDED*****
|