1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility did not issue a refund
It is alleged that a Resident #1 (R1) has not received a refund for over $1000 after moving out. R1 had notified facility 30 days and did not receive the refund to this date.
Based on observation, LPA verified that R1 no longer resides at the facility via the Resident Roster dated June 16, 2025. R1 moved out on May 24, 2025.
Based on record review, the Admission Agreement dated April 12, 2025, states “the total monthly rate will be prorated/refunded upon the resident’s admission or departure from the facility during the month provided the resident has given an appropriate 30-day notice in writing to vacate.” LPA Kim conducted three staff interviews. One out of the three staff interviews confirmed that the refund was not issued to the resident while a second staff confirmed receiving a text notification that R1 would move out on May 24, 2025. Per review of the billing invoice shows the resident paid for the month of May, but an invoice for the refund was not issued, which corroborates the allegation.
Therefore, based on LPA's observations, interviews, and the records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Facility did not issue a refund is deemed SUBSTANTIATED as per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. A deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report, LIC9099D, LIC811, and the appeal rights were provided to Administrator Joanna Gomez |