1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (2) Staff did not ensure children were not drinking other children’s water
It was alleged that staff did not ensure children were not drinking other children’s water. During staff interviews, a staff member stated they have observed a child reach out and grab another child’s water and bring it to their mouth, but that they took immediate action to stop the behavior. LPA did not observe the behavior during visits, and saw that the water bottles in the toddler room are currently labeled. Based on available information, The preponderance of evidence standard is not met; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have occurred or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it.
(3) Facility is operating out of ratio.
It was alleged that the facility was operating out of ratio. LPA observations and interviews with staff did not produce further evidence to support the allegation. Based on the information collected, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have occurred or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it.
(4) Infant care accepted sick children into care
It was alleged that staff was not screening for sick children and allowing them into care. Staff interviews demonstrated a knowledge of policy regarding the screening of children presenting symptoms of illness. Parent interviews did not produce further evidence that their sick children were accepted into care, and LPA did not observe sick children present during visits. Based on the information collected, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have occurred or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it.
(5) Staff do not wash their hands after feeding
It was alleged that staff were not washing their hands after feeding. Staff interviews demonstrated a knowledge of the need to wash hands after feeding, and LPA did not observe improper food handling during visits. Based on the information collected, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have occurred or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it.
|