1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff interview revealed R1 arrived at the facility with (2) medication patches on their body from their previous placement. It was revealed R1’s legal representative and a representative from R1’s hospice agency were also present for the incident. Interview with R1’s legal representative confirmed they witnessed R1 arrive to the facility with (2) medication patches on their body.
R1’s medication’s list revealed one medication patch for M1 was prescribed every 72 hours. Hospice visit notes for R1 revealed they resided at the facility from 11/21/2022 to 12/24/2022. The visit notes did not reveal any medication errors for R1’s patch. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not administer R1’s medication patches as prescribed is unfounded at this time.
It was alleged “Staff do not follow physician's order”. It was alleged R1’s speech pathologist ordered to not thicken R1’s liquids and that facility staff did not comply. Additional information for the speech pathologist was not available and review of R1’s hospice care plan did not reveal an assigned speech pathologist.
Interview with R1 was unable to be conducted as R1 has since passed away. LPA conducted (2) interviews with staff who cared for R1. (1) of (2) staff did not recall a speech pathologist being assigned to R1, and they recalled having physician’s orders to thicken R1 liquids as R1 had difficulty swallowing.
Medications list for R1 revealed fluid thickener was ordered by R1’s physician and started on 10/5/2022. Instructions on the medication list stated to thicken liquids to a nectar thick consistency. Therefore, the allegation that staff were not following R1’s physician orders is unfounded.
This agency has investigated the complaints and have found that the complaints are unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
|