1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2/2
Based on the interviews conducted, observations and evidence gathered, at this time there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation provider yells at day care children, LPA Gerth interviewed S1, who works varied hours, 5 days per week with the Licensee and reports that at no time has S1 been witness of any children in care being yelled at. In addition, children’s interviews revealed that at no time have they been yelled at. Interviews conducted, evidence gathered, and records reviewed do not support the allegation, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation provider serves spoiled food. During the visit on November 14, 2024, lunch was being prepared by both the Licensee and S1 and then served while LPA was at the facility. LPA observed all food to be fresh and of good quality. Additionally, the Licensee provided proof that the daycare uses the services of the Child Nutrition Program (CNP) of Southern California, as well as reports from the CNP’s unannounced inspections where representatives review the quality and nutritional value of meals served. LPA Gerth collected copies of the last 3 CNP Site Review Reports, dated November 12, 2024, July 9, 2024, and March 14, 2024. Each report reflected that the food served to children in care was of the nutritional, portion size, quality and freshness deemed appropriate by the CNP representative. LPA also inspected the food used for the daycare children’s meals and all foods were fresh and, stored properly. Licensee also stated that the specific incident of spoiled raspberries referenced in the complaint allegation, was addressed when the fruit was opened the same day and the food was not served, Licensee provided documented proof of the June 18, 2024, communication that occurred between the Licensee and the delivery service and the request for refund/return of the spoiled fruit. Based on the interviews conducted, observations and evidence gathered, LPA did not find a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A copy of this report, appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit were provided to Licensee Karly Turner and was reminded that the “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. |