1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation that the provider does not ensure clean accommodations to the children in care, LPA conducted a tour of the home, both inside and outside and observed that the backyard had multiple hazards. Including, dog feces scattered throughout the backyard. At the time of the inspection, the licensee stated the backyard was off-limits for months. However, per pertinent interviews conducted, and it was revealed that the children had been in the backyard within the last couple of days. Based on the information gathered, LPA was able to corroborate allegations that provider does not ensure clean accommodations to children in care. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Based on LPA observations, interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22 102423(a)(2) Personal Rights are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
There is a third allegation within this complaint, however, this investigation will be extended during this time in order to obtain additional information. Upon completion of the investigation, findings will be shared with the licensee/facility representative.
An exit interview was conducted with licensee Rosalva Garcia-Carranza. A notice of site visit was given and the licensee Rosalva Garcia-Carranza understands it must be posted for 30 days. |