1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that Licensee is not present in the home 80% of the day, LPA Waters conducted confidential interviews and facility inspection. During the initial inspection on 09/25/24, LPA Waters observed the licensee to be present at the facility, although the licensee spent several minutes at a time in “off-limit” areas. Licensee also stated she had a therapy appointment at the time of LPA’s arrival and rescheduled to remain at the facility during the inspection. Per interviews conducted, LPA confirmed that the Licensee would periodically leave the facility but could not determine the amount of time she was absent from the facility while she was off site. Further interviews revealed that when the Licensee was present in the facility, she would spend a lot of time in other rooms, specifically “off-limits” areas but was unable to determine the amount of time.
Regarding the allegation that Licensee is operating out of ratio, LPA Waters observed 2 staff with 9 children outside while licensee remained inside and in “off-limit” areas the majority of the time LPA was present. During record review, LPA verified that licensee has two employed assistants, currently working from approximately 7:30am-1pm, Monday thru Friday, and an adult child that resides in the facility that is a qualified assistant as well. During course of investigation, LPA did not observe the daycare operating out of ratio.
Regarding the allegation that licensee is not keeping the home clean, neat and orderly, specifically in regard to trash buildup and not washing the bottles used by the children, LPA Waters conducted a facility inspection and interviews with staff. LPA Waters observed a staff member emptying the only trash can for the child care area, located outside in the patio area. LPA also observed labeled water bottles in a plastic bin in the outside area, in clean condition. During the visit, Licensee was observed cleaning daycare room 2 for more than 30 minutes. LPA did not observe any evidence that home was not clean or untidy.
Based on facility inspection, confidential interviews and record review, LPA Waters could not corroborate the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided along with copies of the Appeal Rights were provided.
A Notice of Site visit was given, and Licensee understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. |