1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During resident interviews, 2 out of the 3 residents stated staff have not assisted them in rough manner. 1 out of the 3 resident’s was unable to corroborate on the above allegation. In addition, LPA requested video surveillance from the facility’s common areas. LPA did not observe R1 be assisted in a rough manner.
For the allegation, Staff isolated resident from other residents in the facility.
During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not isolated resident from other residents in the facility. 3 out of the 4 staff stated that they encourage residents to be in the common areas and participate in activities.
During resident interviews, 2 out of the 3 residents stated they are allowed to spend time with other residents in the living room, dining area and patio. 2 out 3 residents stated they have not felt isolated. 1 out of the 3 resident’s was unable to corroborate on the above allegation.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaseth
|