1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, staff denied privacy with resident visitors. During staff interviews, 4 out of 4 staff members stated they ensure residents are provided privacy and the ability to have private conversations with their visitors. During resident interviews, 2 out of 3 residents stated they are allowed to have privacy with their visitors. In addition, 1 out of 3 residents was unable to corroborate the allegation.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the (3) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Tamanna Rahman. |