1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the tour of the home, LPA observed that the furniture was moved out of the room and into an upstairs bathroom. Licensee explained that her carpet was recently replaced and she plans to rearrange the furniture. During today’s visit, LPA observed that the bedrooms appear to be have some bedroom furniture. Furthermore, 3 out of 3 confidential witnesses were interviewed and stated that they believed that the facility was the Licensee’s place of residency. During LPA's visits to the faciliy, LPA was unable to interview the children due to the age of the children in care who were non-verbal.
Based on observations, facility records, and interviews with Licensee, S1, and confidential witnesses, there is not enough evidence to support the allegations that the Licensee does not live in the family day care facility and that Licensee is away from the facility more than 20% of the day. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
A notice of site visit was given to Licensee Llajiara Avendano Chaidez and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and the report was reviewed with Licensee Llajiara Avendano Chaidez. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview. |