1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licesning Program Analyst(LPA) made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the Licensee Ursula Carlos, where explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observation, interviews and record review.
LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior and observed for there to be a video surveillance device in three (3) of the five (5) resident bedrooms. Per the Licensee Resident #1 (R1)s significant other installed the camera in their room, and is the one that monitors the device. However R1 has a roommate and there was no proof of consent, but the Licensee stated that verbal approval was provided agreeing to have a camera and or audio device inside their bedroom. R3 and R4 were observed to have a device inside their room as well, and their responsible parties are reported to have given writtenconsent, however the written approval was not at the facility at the time of LPA's visit. The facility did not obtain approval to utilize any form of video sureveillance from the department. |