1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the information gathered during interviews and document review, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that staff leave residents on the floor for extended periods of time. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. ***************************************************************************************** Allegation – staff do not ensure residents are provided quality food:
As part of the investigation, residents were interviewed. Residents stated that they receive enough food and did not express concerns about the quality of meals. None of the residents confirmed the allegation that food being served is not good or not provided.
Interviews with staff also did not confirm the allegation. Staff members explained that food is always given to residents and that staff provide what residents ask for. Staff reported that meals are prepared daily and follow a regular meal schedule.
LPA reviewed the facility’s menu, which is structured on a 2-week rotating schedule. The menu includes a variety of meals for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and offers different types of proteins (such as sausage, chicken, turkey, ham, and fish), starches (like rice, potatoes, macaroni, waffles, and pancakes), as well as vegetables and fruits. The meals appear to be balanced and follow appropriate food groups. Fruits are mostly served with breakfast and lunch, and many dinners include a protein, a starch, and a vegetable.
LPA also reviewed the residents’ signed admission agreements. Under the “Food Services” section, the agreement states that residents will be provided with three nutritious meals and three snacks each day. It also mentions that special diets will be provided if ordered by a doctor.
Lastly, during site visits on 5/8/25 and 6/18/25, LPAs Arvin Villanueva and Sommer Hayes observed the facility’s kitchen, refrigerators, freezers, and pantry. There was an adequate supply of food, including at least two days’ worth of perishable food and seven days’ worth of non-perishable food. A variety of items were present, such as fresh and frozen meats, vegetables, fruits, and canned goods.
Based on interviews, document review, and observations, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that staff fail to provide residents with quality food. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Note that a finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened, the preponderance of evidence does not prove it.
Based on today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited. Exit interview was conducted with S3 and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
{pg.3} |