1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a follow up case management inspection and met with Vera Okyere, Administrator. LPA stated the reason for the inspection. There are currently (3) residents who live at the home, but (1) resident went to the hospital last night. Currently there are (0) residents receives hospice care.
LPA previously conducted a related case management inspection, on 9/25/24, and discussed resident (R1's) personal property and (R1) being sent to the emergency room on 9/11/24. The Administrator provided documentation related to (R1's) property and receipts for clothing, medication and rent and care charged from 8/26/24- 9/26/24.
The Administrator provided additional documentation by e-mail, as requested, on 9/26/24, showing funds belonging to (R1) had been co-mingled with Licensee's funds. Resident's family member removed (R1's) belongings from his room on 9/30/24, and the Administrator mailed a check for personal funds belonging to (R1) on 10/1/24, which was received on 10/3/24. The physician's report indicates (R1) has a diagnosis of Dementia and requires assistance in managing his own cash resources. LPA and Administrator discussed how a surety bond is required in order to handle residents' funds, and the department was not notified.
During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator discussed how (R1) did not sign the Admission Agreement when moving in on 8/26/24 and that (R1) was charged for 1:1 care, following being sent to the hospital on 9/11/24, and not returning to the facility, as he passed in the hospital on 9/21/24. LPA requested documentation showing a 1:1 staff was provided to (R1) from 8/26/24 until 9/11/24, when (R1) was sent to the emergency room.
Per California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (4) deficiencies are issued on the 809-D pages, as well as a Technical Advisory Note.
Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights provided. |