1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | None of the residents expressed concerns regarding bathing services. During facility visits conducted on 02/05/2026, 03/10/2026, and 04/20/2026, LPA Lee toured the facility and resident bedrooms and did not observe any odors of incontinence or other unpleasant smells. During the visit on 04/20/2026, residents observed in the lobby, outdoor patio, and activity room appeared clean and well-groomed. The nine residents interviewed also appeared clean and appropriately groomed. A review of the facility's shower schedule indicated that residents are scheduled to receive showers at least two to three times per week and additionally as needed. Furthermore, LPA Lee reviewed shower logs for 10 residents from January 2026 through March 2026. The records showed that residents received an average of eight to twelve showers per month. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff do not meet residents' bathing needs.
It was alleged that staff do not respond timely to residents' call lights. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, observations, and a review of facility records. Based on the investigation, it was learned that the facility utilizes a call light system in each resident's room. Residents activate the system by pulling a cord, which illuminates a light outside the resident's room to alert staff to ensure that assistance is needed. The activation also appears on call panels located in the front lobby and at the nurse station. Staff then communicate via walkie-talkie with Resident Aides (RAs) regarding the resident's location and need assistance. LPA Lee interviewed five out of five staff members, all of whom denied the allegation and stated that resident call lights are responded to promptly. Additionally, six out of nine residents interviewed reported that staff generally respond to their call lights within five to ten minutes and expressed no concerns regarding delayed staff response times. During a facility visit conducted on 04/20/2026, LPA Lee observed and tested nine call light response events. Staff response times ranged from one to seven minutes, with an average response time of approximately three minutes. A review of facility records revealed that call light response logs were not available. The Administrator stated that the facility recently implemented a new call light system that remains in a trial phase and has not yet gone live; therefore, historical call log reports were unavailable at the time of the investigation. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff do not respond timely to residents' call lights.
CONTINUED LIC 9099-C
|