<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 342700835
Report Date: 06/08/2026
Date Signed: 06/08/2026 10:00:27 AM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
03/10/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Pang Lee
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 27-AS-20260310101851
FACILITY NAME:CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVINGFACILITY NUMBER:
342700835
ADMINISTRATOR:CALEB SUMMERHAYSFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:6254 66TH AVENUETELEPHONE:
(916) 393-2324
CITY:SACRAMENTOSTATE: CAZIP CODE:
95823
CAPACITY:121CENSUS: 113DATE:
06/08/2026
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
08:29 AM
MET WITH:Caleb Summerhays and Katelyn FloresTIME COMPLETED:
10:16 AM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff do not meet the residents bathing needs
Staff do not respond timely to the residents alerts
Staff yell at the residents
Staff behavior poses as a risk to the residents
Staff do not provide adequate supervision to the residents
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
On 06/08/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Lee met with Administrator Caleb Summerhays and Health Servies Director (HSD) Katelyn Flores and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 113. A brief interview was conducted with both Summerhays and Flores.

It was alleged that facility staff do not meet residents' bathing needs. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, observations, and a review of facility records. LPA Lee interviewed 5 out of 5 staff members, all of whom denied the allegation and stated that residents receive assistance with bathing and showers as needed. LPA Lee also interviewed 9 out of 9 residents, all of whom denied the allegation and reported that facility staff provide and assist them with showers.

CONTINUED LIC 9099-C
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Czarrina A Camilon-Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Pang Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 3
Control Number 27-AS-20260310101851
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
FACILITY NAME: CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY NUMBER: 342700835
VISIT DATE: 06/08/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
None of the residents expressed concerns regarding bathing services. During facility visits conducted on 02/05/2026, 03/10/2026, and 04/20/2026, LPA Lee toured the facility and resident bedrooms and did not observe any odors of incontinence or other unpleasant smells. During the visit on 04/20/2026, residents observed in the lobby, outdoor patio, and activity room appeared clean and well-groomed. The nine residents interviewed also appeared clean and appropriately groomed. A review of the facility's shower schedule indicated that residents are scheduled to receive showers at least two to three times per week and additionally as needed. Furthermore, LPA Lee reviewed shower logs for 10 residents from January 2026 through March 2026. The records showed that residents received an average of eight to twelve showers per month. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff do not meet residents' bathing needs.

It was alleged that staff do not respond timely to residents' call lights. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, observations, and a review of facility records. Based on the investigation, it was learned that the facility utilizes a call light system in each resident's room. Residents activate the system by pulling a cord, which illuminates a light outside the resident's room to alert staff to ensure that assistance is needed. The activation also appears on call panels located in the front lobby and at the nurse station. Staff then communicate via walkie-talkie with Resident Aides (RAs) regarding the resident's location and need assistance. LPA Lee interviewed five out of five staff members, all of whom denied the allegation and stated that resident call lights are responded to promptly. Additionally, six out of nine residents interviewed reported that staff generally respond to their call lights within five to ten minutes and expressed no concerns regarding delayed staff response times. During a facility visit conducted on 04/20/2026, LPA Lee observed and tested nine call light response events. Staff response times ranged from one to seven minutes, with an average response time of approximately three minutes. A review of facility records revealed that call light response logs were not available. The Administrator stated that the facility recently implemented a new call light system that remains in a trial phase and has not yet gone live; therefore, historical call log reports were unavailable at the time of the investigation. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff do not respond timely to residents' call lights.

CONTINUED LIC 9099-C

SUPERVISORS NAME: Czarrina A Camilon-Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Pang Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 3
Control Number 27-AS-20260310101851
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
FACILITY NAME: CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY NUMBER: 342700835
VISIT DATE: 06/08/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
It was alleged that staff yell at residents and that staff behavior poses a risk to residents in care. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, as well as facility observations. LPA Lee interviewed 5 out of 5 staff members, all of whom denied the allegation. Staff stated that they do not yell at residents and have not observed other staff members yelling at or behaving inappropriately toward residents. LPA Lee also interviewed 8 out of 9 residents, all of whom denied being yelled at by facility staff and being treated inappropriately. Residents reported that staff are “nice” and that they had no concerns regarding staff behavior. During facility visits conducted on 02/05/2026, 03/10/2026, and 04/20/2026, LPA Lee toured the facility and resident bedrooms and did not observe any staff yelling at residents or engaging in behavior that would place residents at risk. Based on interviews conducted and observations made during the investigation, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that staff yell at residents and that staff behavior poses a risk to residents in care.

It was alleged that facility staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, as well as facility observations. LPA Lee interviewed 5 out of 5 staff members, all of whom denied the allegation. Staff stated that personal cell phone use is prohibited during working hours. Staff further explained that Resident Aides (RAs), medication technicians, and management are issued facility cell phones that are used as walkie-talkies to communicate regarding resident needs, call lights, and other operational matters. LPA Lee also interviewed 8 out of 9 residents, all of whom denied the allegation and reported no concerns regarding staff supervision or staff using phones while providing care. During the facility visit conducted on 04/20/2026, LPA Lee observed Resident Aides using facility-issued phones to communicate with other staff members regarding resident call lights activated in Rooms 110 and 115. LPA Lee did not observe staff using personal cell phones while on duty, nor were any residents observed to be neglected or unsupervised as a result of staff phone use. Based on interviews conducted and observations made during the investigation, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation that facility staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents.

The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Czarrina A Camilon-Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Pang Lee
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 06/08/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 3 of 3