1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Staff did not prevent resident from becoming malnourished while in care” LPA interviewed R1 responsible party on 2/20/25 who stated R1 was not malnourished while living in the facility and that R1 looked and was doing great. The Administrator stated we feed the residents healthy food, they don't lose weight because of the food.
Regarding allegation, “Staff are not meeting resident's needs” LPA interviewed R1 responsible party on 2/20/25 who stated R1 was well cared for while living at the facility. RP stated visits were frequent and all residents there were getting the proper care they needed. The Administrator stated we do everything the residents need all the time.
The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. |