1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During this time period, LPA Moleski did not smell any odors of urine or feces from residents or from their bedrooms. LPA Moleski did observe staff assisting residents to the bathroom in order to care for their continence needs, and otherwise observed residents being assisted with their activities of daily living (ADLs). LPA Moleski observed residents’ clothing and bed linens to be clean.
LPA Moleski interviewed four residents who were able to respond verbally and coherently (R1, R2, R6, and R7). Of these, two were not diagnosed with any sort of cognitive impairments (R2 and R7). R1 voiced no concerns with their quality of care, and said they receive all assistance when needed. R2 voiced no concerns with quality of care, and said that other residents are cared for appropriately by staff, such as ensuring that they are bathed and that their diapers are changed regularly. R6 voiced no concerns with their quality of care and said they had their basic needs met. R7 said that although they did not receive showers, they do receive bed baths on a regular basis. R7 said they receive assistance with other ADLs when requested.
In interviews, four residents’ responsible parties (R1’s RP, R4’s RP, R5’s RP, and R6’s RP) voiced no significant concerns with the quality of direct care at the facility.
The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that staff do not ensure residents have clean linens, that staff do not assist residents with their ADLs, and that staff do not assist residents with toileting:
Based on interviews and observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
No deficiencies were cited regarding the above allegations. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Clark. |