NARRATIVE |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | well, experiencing weakness, confusion and runny nose. On 11/06/2024, at 6:30 PM, R1 was seen by paramedic due to weakness and back pain. R1 refused to go to the ER. On 11/07/2024 at 12:29 PM the home health agency providing services to R1 called 911 due to R1’s weakness and confusion. Staff became aware of R1 having a change in condition on 11/5/2024. Staff interviews and facility notes do
not show that staff contacted R1’s primary care provider (PCP) when the change of condition was noted. Based on documentation and information provided through interviews there was a preponderance of evidence to show that the facility did not properly assess resident and did not report the change in condition to PCP as required and therefore this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
It was alleged that “Facility did not allow resident to come back to the facility after being hospitalized.” Per facility documentation dated 11/18/2024 at 3:18PM, the facility was notified that R1 would be discharged back to Eskaton Gold River the following day on 11/19/2024. On 11/19/2024, the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) for the facility called the hospital requesting that R1 be transferred to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation, stating that R1 has to be able to bare weight otherwise R1 is not appropriate for the facility. The facility should have allowed R1 to return home as the hospital stated that R1 needed a 2-person assist, and not any mechanical interventions/accommodations. The facility refused. The facility should have allowed R1 to return home, re-assessed R1's needs, and updated R1's care plan.
If after a thorough assessment, it was determined that the facility could not continue to meet R1's needs, the responsible party should have been notified. An updated care plan should have been created and a draft of a 30-day eviction letter stating that the resident required a higher level of care, along with supporting documentation, should have been submitted to Community Care Licensing for review. The facility should have also assisted the resident and their responsible party in locating an appropriate placement, as required.
Based on documentation and information provided through interviews there was a preponderance of evidence to show that the "Facility did not allow resident to come back to the facility after being hospitalized," and therefore this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with AD Alfredo Cruz and a copy of this report was provided along with APPEAL RIGHTS. |
Deficiency Type
POC Due Date /
Section Number | DEFICIENCIES | PLAN OF CORRECTIONS(POCs) |
Type A
08/21/2025
Section Cited
CCR
87466 | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Observation of the Resident
The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional... appropriate assistance is provided...
The Licensee did not meet the above requirement when:
| 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | The Licensee hired a new Executive Director as of 12/05/24 and the new ED has held the team accountable with regard to reporting requirements and residents' change of condition. There is also a new Resident Care Director to oversee assessments, re-appraisals and family care conferences |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | Based on a review of records and interviews, staff became aware of R1 having a change in condition on 11/5/2024 and staff did not contact R1’s (PCP) when the change of condition was noted. This posed an immediate threat to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care. | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | This POC has been cleared. |
Type A
08/21/2025
Section Cited
CCR
87468.2(a)20 | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities
(20) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions...
The Licensee did not meet the above requirement when: | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 | The ED will communicate with residents and responsible parties Eskaton's policy regarding resident transfers and the use of mechanical lists. This will be accomplished though a recorded Family Meeting on 08/21/25. The agenda and link to the meeting will be forwarded to |
 | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | Based on a review of records and interviews, on 11/19/24, the RCC did not allow R1 to return to the facility when the hospital tried to discharge R1 so R1 could return home. This posed an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of residents in care. | 8
9
10
11
12
13
14 | CCLASCPSacramentoRO@dss.ca.gov. |