1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Second allegation: Facility were not ensuring residents care needs were being met. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with R#2, R#3, and R#4, LPA went over the allegation stated above and R#2-4, informed LPA that they have no concerns, and that the facility meets their care needs on the daily. In addition, R#2-4 informed LPA that they enjoy living at the facility and that they feel safe. LPA conducted interviews with S#1 and S#2 LPA went over the allegation stated above and staff #1-2 denied the allegation and informed LPA that staff always ensures that residents needs are always being met. Based on corroborating evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Unsubstantiated: meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav at the end of the visit. |