1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Hogue investigated the above allegation and gathered the following information. According to interviews with pertinent parties, on or about March 3, 2022 a classroom was transitioning from outside play time to inside the classroom. A staff member had the children line up against the outdoor fencing to enter the classroom. While lining up, a child(ren) got out of line and ran toward the outdoor gate which leads to the facility parking lot. The staff member in the classroom went after the child(ren) and redirected the child(ren) to return to the line.
Staff denied the allegation. According to staff interviews, when the subject staff member went to retrieve the child(ren) from the gate, he/she spoke to the child(ren) about running out of line, then had the child(ren) grab their pinky finger(s) and walked him/her to the line. However, LPA Hogue interviewed additional parties and it was disclosed that the staff member spoke with the child(ren) and redirected the child(ren) by grabbing their forearm and directing them to return to the line. Interview disclosure revealed the subject child(ren) was observed crying, not because they were handled in a rough manner, but because they felt they were in “trouble” for running to/by the gate.
Children interviews were conducted and revealed that children were playing outside and lining up at the gate. A child(ren) got in “trouble” because he/she ran down to the gate and fell down. Per interviews, the subject staff member did not yell at the child(ren) and did not push or grab the involved child(ren).
The allegation was also reported to local law enforcement and based on information received from their investigation of the incident the subject staff member held a child(ren)’s hand and walked him/her out of the restricted area. The subject staff member had the child(ren) place their backs against the wall and the child(ren) were not injured. Law enforcement closed the investigation.
Based on interviews with pertinent parties, there is conflicting information on whether a child(ren) was handled in a rough manner by a staff member. Therefore, it has been determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director Emily Calhoun.
|