1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Pertinent parties confirmed that during the first two weeks of the month of May, child was fed on a consistent time as scheduled and any questions and concerns were addressed properly and timely on the "App" by Staff #2. However, the day in question, information in the "App" was uncleared and/or inaccurate as provided previously by Staff#2 who was absent the day of the incident.
The last day that the child(ren) was in care there were 12 children under the care and supervision of Staff #1, Staff #3-Staff#4. Teacher to Child ratio: 1:4. Per interviews conducted, facility staff denies not feeding child(ren) as needed and acknowledged understanding that each individual infant as special feeding times depending on age and/or stage of the child. Per Staff#1, child in question was offered a bottle at approximately 11:15 a.m.-11:30 a.m.,but it was rejected by the child. It was disclosed by Staff#1 that bottle was offered without the power milk being mix in it. Staff#1 verifying that the child ate solid food at approximately 11:45 a.m. and uploaded the information in the "App" at approximately 11:54 a.m. It is uncleared how much food the infant consumed the last day in question while in care; to accurately confirmed that the daycare child was not adequately fed.
During this inspection, LPA verify infant(s) room(s) , foods, supplies, and "App" to be in substantial compliance. Per Director, Fanny Topete, pertinent parties and staff involved in the incident had a discussion to resolve the incident and to find a reliable solution for all parties involved. However, child in question was disenrolled from the facility and all partial tuition for the month of May was reimbursed to pertinent parties.
Due to the conflicting information and based on the information gathered, there isn’t enough evidence to collaborate the reported allegations. Therefore, based on interviews with pertinent parties and records reviewed, the above allegations is deemed unsubstantiated, at this time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to facility by Director, Fanny Topete
A Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to the interior of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |