1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Four (4) out of five (5) resident interviews reveal that there is substance and/or variety in the food served to them.
Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure that food served to the residents matches what is on the menu, interviews with the Administrator and staff reveals the facility prepares a sample menu. Menus are changed and food is bought according to resident's request and special events. Three (3) out of (5) residents interviews reveal that they do not request to see a menu but staff do ask for suggestions of meals they will like to be served.
Regarding the allegation, staff is not following the residents' special diets, interviews with the Administrator and staff deny not following the residents' special diets. Interviews with five (5) residents reveal not enough evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Based on the investigation findings, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report with appeal rights was provided to Administrator Tanabe at the conclusion of the visit.
|