1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | W1 stated that R1 was checked for any marks/injuries/bruising but did not find any.
In regards to allegation #2, LPA interviewed R1 who stated that facility staff would threaten to send R1 to the "mental hospital" if R1 reported the alleged physical abuse occurring to R1. LPA interviewed S1, S2, and S3, who all stated that they did not threaten R1. S1, S2, and S3 stated that there was no physical abuse to report. LPA interviewed R2 and R3 who both stated that they have not felt threatened while residing at the facility.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA interviewed S2 who stated that R1 has requested to move out of the facility on numerous occasions and consented to being placed at R1's current home. LPA interviewed R1, who stated that they are unaware of who and how they were placed into another home. R1 stated that R1 is unaware if an eviction notice was provided to them. LPA asked if R1 consented to being placed into another home, to which R1 could not provide a consistent response. LPA interviewed S1 who confirmed S2's interview statement that R1 requested to be moved into another facility and consented to being moved.
Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator via email. |