1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff interviews revealed that Staff 1 (S1) Staff 2 (S2) were aware of the rodent infestation within the facility. S1 required help from S2 and an Outside Source 1 (OS1) to help set up pest control appointments. According to staff, there were independent contractors hired to come and set up rodent traps as well as fix and install patchwork to prevent access of rodents in the facility.
Resident Interviews revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had witnessed several occurrences of rodents scurrying around; specifically near the bathroom and on the outside near the garage and patio. R1 also reported hearing rodents in the walls.
Outside Source Interviews revealed that OS1 helped facility staff to set up appointments for a pest control company to come and set down rodent traps and patch holes in the attic. OS1 confirmed that the initial pest control company was too expensive for the services they offered and instead decided to hire independent contractors at a later date to take care of the rodent issues.
LPA observations revealed that there were several spots inside of the garage and around the premises that had pockets of rodent droppings and a urine smell. LPA acquired photographic evidence of the observations. Coincidentally on the day of the visit from licensing, while the LPA was present, the aforementioned independent contractor visited the facility and provided assistance and advice on the pest control issue.
Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that alleged violation(s) occurred and are therefore substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |