1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC9099-A]
While touring the facility, LPA could not find food beyond the expiration date.
While reviewing facility files, LPA found that one of the “adult guests” (AG1) mentioned in the complaint has criminal record clearance and is associated to the facility. Regarding the second person mentioned, (AG2) is AG1’s partner. Per interviews with the facility’s current and only resident (R1), AG2 does not visit the facility often, and in fact, R1 mentioned not knowing AG2.
Based on records reviewed, LPA observations, records review, and interviews conducted with the resident (R1), reporting party (RP), and Licensee, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.
|