1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099)
Background Information
Review of R1’s admission agreement and other relevant records did not disclose any diagnosis or condition related to dementia. Records reviewed during the investigation confirmed that R1 moved into the facility in April 2025 and voluntarily moved out in October 2025, residing at the facility for approximately six months. Multiple interviews conducted during the investigation described R1 as alert and oriented to person, place, and time, capable of advocating for themselves, and considered a credible witness. Records and interviews further disclosed that R1 had a history of verbal disagreements with staff and other residents and was frequently described as difficult to redirect. Staff and outside sources consistently described R1 as unhappy living at the facility.
During an interview conducted on May 28, 2026, R1 stated that S1 spoke inappropriately to them and threatened eviction. R1 alleged that on or about October 1, 2025, S1 told R1 “to get out by the end of the month or else they would wish they had.” R1 also stated that S1 brought dogs into the facility and that during one incident, a dog approached R1, causing R1 to lift their legs to avoid contact. According to R1, S1 yelled across the room, “Don’t you dare kick my dog.” R1 stated they were attempting to move away from the dog and denied attempting to kick it.
R1 further alleged that following this incident, S1 instructed staff to withhold certain services, including clean bedsheets, timely meals, and shower assistance. However, during the investigation, R1 was unable to provide specific dates, times, or examples when services were allegedly not provided. R1 stated that residents and staff witnessed the incident but was unable to recall names or additional identifying information.
R1 stated that S2 advocated on their behalf and often intervened during disagreements involving R1 and S1. On May 28, 2026, during an interview, S2 recalled assisting with de-escalating situations involving R1 and staff or other residents in general. S2 stated that R1 frequently became upset during interactions with others and that de-escalation interventions were often effective. However, S2 denied ever witnessing or hearing S1 threaten, mistreat, or speak inappropriately to R1.
(continue at LIC9099C) |