1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from 9099)
Regarding the allegation, the Licensee did not allow R1 visitors. More specifically, staff denied visitation to R1 on their birthday, despite proof of vaccination provided. Outside Source #1(OS1) stated they tried to visit R1 on their birthday but were denied entry and recalls it was due to COVID-19 screening issues with the facility. OS1 interview further reveals they were allowed entry in the facility to visit to R1 during previous visits. Interviews with the Manager on Duty during the time period states R1 was showing signs of agitation that day, and they did ask R1 if they wanted visitors. Interview further reveal R1 stated they did not want visitors that day. Outside Source #2(OS2) and outside source #3(OS3) inter views reveal they never observed any visitors being denied entry nor have heard any complaints about visitors not being able to visit the residents of the facility.
Regarding the allegation, the Licensee did not safeguard the R1's belongings. More specifically, R1's passport and two purses are missing. Interviews with the Former Business Office Director reveal the facility discourages any valuables brought to facility. They also state they do not recall R1 having valuables or passports. Emergency Personnel report (dated 6/6/2022) can not confirm or deny any items were taken from R1’s room. However, during the search, the officer was able to locate one purse under the bed and three missing glasses, but was unable to locate a beaded and purse that was one of the items R1 reported missing. The officer also noted that, while speaking with R1, they would have mood alterations and become argumentative. Based on evidence obtained from interviews, observations and records reviewed, no corroborating evidence was obtained to indicate the facility failed to safeguard a client’s belongings.
Based on the Department's investigation, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Nora Garza to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) will be provided at the conclusion of today's visit. |