1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099-A)
It was alleged staff retaliated against a resident. More specifically it was alleged Staff #1 (S1) spoke of retaliating against resident #1 (R1) by stating they are trying to move R1 from the facility. Although the reported party stated they observed S1 speaking about retaliation. Staff interviews and interviews with residents did not corroborate the allegation, as staff consistently denied witnessing any form of retaliation by S1 to residents. Resident interviews, including R1, denied witnessing any form of retaliation by S1 to residents.
It was also alleged staff did not meet residents needs and staff did not meet resident's incontinence needs. More specially, licensee staff did not help with R1 for over an hour after R1 request with incontinent needs, clothing changing and providing breakfast service. A review of R1 needs and service (dated 11/26/2021) reveals toileting and grooming as independent. Additionally resident will remain as much independence as possible with bathing and showering. The report further states the R1 will retain ability to partially dress self and staff will help with balance while dressing. R1 was interviewed around the time of the complaint and no evidence could be found in the interview to support the allegation. Records review as well as interviews with the licensee, staff, and medical personnel, were conducted and revealed that although some residents required more incontinence and toileting care, there wasn’t any documentation of concern for neglect, abuse, or non-accidental injuries were noted.
Based on the Department's investigation, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Nora Garza to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) will be provided at the conclusion of today's visit. |