1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
An outside protective agency familiar with the facility informed that they had not been made aware of any medication errors for the timeframe of complaint and did not have any concerns. An outside medical agency familiar with R1 informed that there have been no medication errors for R1 and no concerns about medication administration at the facility.
Review of facility records did not corroborate the allegation. Progress notes for R1 showed that R1's prescription for a behavior condition was adjusted, resulting in them presenting as more lethargic than normal. R1 was placed on alert charting during the timeframe of concern, the notes showing that the new prescription was effective. Review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not evidence that a medication error had occurred. No records were found to corroborate that a medication error occurred.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Calais Anguiano, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |