1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
On 07/07/2022, CCLD commenced a separate complaint investigation regarding this facility, not disclosing the identity of that case’s Complainant. During that site visit, Licensee was instructed verbally and in writing that the case status as of that date was “Needs Further Investigation,” that the investigation was active/ongoing, and that additional interviews would need to be conducted by CCLD.
Interviews of outside sources and review of outside source records showed: After CCLD’s departure from the facility on 07/07/2022, Licensee approached and questioned responsible parties and hospice personnel belonging to two residents [R1 and Resident #2 (R2)] regarding the complaint allegations, allegations of which were still under active investigation by the Department. Persons reported that Licensee’s actions created discomfort.
Based on interviews and records, a preponderance of evidence exists to show that Licensee’s actions did not uphold residents’ right to confidentially register complaints, free from interference and/or retaliation. The allegation is therefore Substantiated. One (1) deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D page). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee.
An exit interview was conducted with Riosa, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 9099-D page, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |