1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On September 28, 2023, between 10:10 AM and 01:15 PM, the Department interviewed resident members identified as Resident #1 through Resident #3 (R1-R3). Three (3) out of the three (3) resident members stated that the facility is directing residents toward alternative transportation methods. This includes advising residents to secure taxi or Uber rides, or to arrange medical or dental transportation services through family members. Furthermore, all resident members, along with one staff member, confirmed that residents have been explicitly informed that they will not receive reimbursement for transportation expenses incurred for services within 10 miles of the facility.
On March 29, 2025, between 09:25 AM and 11:45 AM, the Department interviewed resident members identified as Resident #4 through Resident #9 (R1-R9). Five (5) out of the six (6) residents replied that the transportation van was out of service during 2023; they had to arrange alternative transportation for social, medical, and dental activities. They were unsure about the transportation limited mileage policy and whether residents had to cover transportation expenses out of pocket.
On March 29, 2025, between 11:50 AM and 12:30 PM, the Department interviewed staff members identified as Staff #6 and Staff #7. One (1) of the two (2) staff members confirmed that the facility could not provide transportation services with the non-operating van. Residents had to make their transportation arrangements along with an enforced 10-mile radius policy.
The Department reviewed Resident #1’s Residence and Care Agreement in California, dated June 6, 2022. This review revealed that the facility's “10-mile radius policy” is inconsistent with the terms outlined in the residential agreement, which outlines a "12-mile radius policy". Additionally, an entry in the facility’s Transportation Log from September 26, 2023, noted an appointment scheduled at 1:30 PM, which exceeded the specified 10-mile limit, further demonstrating the facility's implementation of this policy.
Based on the gathered information, sufficient evidence is demonstrated to substantiate the validity of this allegation
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and analysis, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations that "Staff are not assisting resident with transportation" and "Staff are not adhering to the admission agreement" are determined Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted, and Activities Director Adriana Marquez was provided with a copy of this report and appeals rights.
This report serves as an amendment to clarify the finding. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected in the report created 03/29/25.
|