1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099]
CCLD studied the signals data for six (6), randomly selected, twenty-four-hour days, chosen from the complaint allegation period. During the surveyed days, there were a total of 227 resident pendant calls, of which 182 (or 80.2%) were answered by staff in ten (10) minutes or less, and of which 206 (86.3%) were answered by staff in fifteen (15) minutes or less. Work schedules showed that on the surveyed days, Licensee consistently utilized third-party staffing agencies, when needed, to plug/fill staffing vacancies which were not already filled internally by facility caregivers.
Interviews of Medication Technicians and Caregivers showed a pattern of teamwork, communication, and clarity of expectation, as it related to responding to resident signal alerts. Staff interviews and documentation further showed that facility managers met several times per week to review and discuss signals report data, from a quality assurance standpoint.
Based on the totality of records and interviews, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to show that Licensee’s staff did not timely respond to resident signals/alerts. The allegation was therefore Unsubstantiated, and no deficiency was cited for it.
An exit interview was conducted with Boeddeker, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |