1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099 p.1)
The outside source corroborated staff statements regarding R1's resistance to care and change in condition. The outside source further informed that R1 had been making emotionally-charged statements about their care that were not really happening, such as insinuating that they do not have a choice in activities of daily living (ADLs), as if they were being forced. The outside source informed that staff had become resourceful in making sure R1's care needs were met and did not have any concerns.
During and unannounced facility visit LPA walked the floor in question and only observed the stairwell door to close loudly, which was not near R1's room. LPA observed R1's room door slightly ajar during the visit while R1 was sleeping. LPA did not observe the caregivers on the floor to be loud or deal with any resident in a way that violated their dignity.
Interviews were attempted with R1, however R1 was observed to be sleeping during the facility visit and unable to be interviewed.
No facility records were found to affirm or refute the allegation.
Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Rob Daynes, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. |