1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 10/22/2024, from approximately 11:36am to 3:49pm, Investigator Jauregui conducted interviews with Witness #1 (W1), residents, Administrator, and staff; on 11/06/2024, from approximately 9:05am to 3:46pm, with French Hospital social worker and Central Coast Home Health (CCHH) personnel; on 11/12/2024, at approximately 2:42pm, with R1’s friend; on 11/14/2024, at approximately 1:48pm, with R1’s friend; on 11/19/2024, at approximately 2:55pm, with CCHH personnel; on 11/21/2024, from approximately 2:21pm to 3:44pm, with the Department’s nurse consultant, and attempted interviews with French Hospital social worker and physician; on 12/05/2024, from approximately 2:01pm to 2:52pm, with R1’s friend and attempted to contact French Hospital social worker. In addition, the investigator reviewed French Hospital medical records and facility file documents pertinent to the investigation.
A review of R1’s Physician Report, dated 07/06/2024, lists the primary diagnosis as generalized weakness and the secondary diagnosis as Parkinson’s disease. The report documented R1 had mild cognitive impairment, motor impairment/paralysis with stiff and slow movements, needed minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), intermittently confused and disoriented, able to follow directions and communicate needs. The report further documented R1 as ambulatory, but not able to independently transfer to and from bed. There was no indication of any drug abuse past or present.
A review of the French Hospital medical records for the period of 9/12/2024 through 10/19/2024 revealed denial of illegal substances, and lab work showed no presence of illegal substances for prior visits on 09/12/2024 and 09/30/2024. The records document on 10/07/2024, R1 was admitted to the French Hospital regarding increased weakness. It was determined R1’s mild cognitive impairment/dementia was progressively worsening. According to the 10/07/2024 record “a urine drug test was conducted on R1 which tested negative for opiates.” “The test also showed Fentanyl < (less than) 1.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) were found in R1’s system. The records indicate that to be considered a positive result, the concentration value must be greater than or equal to the cut off which is 1.0 ng/mL…” “The exam did not contain the quantitative results. On 10/08/2024, unknown time, under progress notes, the doctor documented a positive exam for the use of Fentanyl.” According to the hospital, R1’s prescribed medications indicated they would not have caused a positive Fentanyl result.
Continued on 9099-C |