1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA toured resident room, there was a room divider, both residents are on Hospice and non-ambulatory. Facility has discussed this with family members and have received signed notices stating representatives are aware and approve of the sharing of the room with the opposite gender.
Based on interviews, records and observation, there is insufficient evidence to show that the resident personal rights are being violated. Therefore, at this time, the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated.
On the allegation: Staff are not meeting residents nutritional needs
It was alleged that caregivers were instructed by Hospice to increase the thickening of liquids for Resident 1 (R1) to reduce the risk of choking, and to take additional time assisting Resident 2 (R2) during meals to encourage greater food intake. It was further alleged that staff remove food without providing adequate assistance.
According to physician documentation, R1 is on a pureed diet. Hospice notes indicate that liquids should be thickened to a “nectar” consistency using 1–2 scoops of thickening agent. The thickening agent is documented on R1’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). During the visit, a properly labeled container of thickening agent was observed in the medication storage area. Interview with lead staff, they were able to explain R1’s orders, and preferences.
R2 has chopped diet. Hospice notes recommend offering preferred foods frequently and allowing additional time and assistance during meals. Dietician notes confirm that caregivers are following the established care plan for R2. Interview with lead staff, they were able to explain R2’s behaviors, and alternative methods, such as allowing R2 space, then returning to encourage R2 to eat if they had not. A new supportive spoon was introduced and note from hospice agency as of 9/10/25 state R2 is “reported to be doing better since [R2] has had a change in medications and has been able to feed [themselves] more frequently with the use of the adaptive spoon”
Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on 9099-C |