1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews conducted, staff stated that the only “on-limit” areas of the home accessible to children are the backyard, living room, and bathroom. Staff also informed LPA that all bedrooms are “off-limits” to children. When asked about supervision, both staff stated that children are always supervised at all times. An interview with parent(s) indicated they have no concerns regarding supervision of children and no concerns about children being in off-limit areas, as the Licensee does not allow access to those areas. When interviewed, child 1 (C1) and child 3 (C3) stated that the Licensee watches her and that they takes her naps in the living room (designated daycare area). Both children also confirmed that they like being at daycare and that no one is mean to them.
This Department and the Gilroy Police Department attempted to interview alleged victim, child 2 (C2).
C2 who was allegedly allowed to sleep and play in off-limit areas of the home, spanked by a spatula, and kissed on the cheek by an adult in the home was not interviewed due to lack of consent from parent.
Based on interviews, and evidence gathered during the course of the investigation, it is concluded that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Exit interview conducted with Licensee, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided along with appeal rights. |