1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff S2. S2 stated he/she was off when the incident occurred. S2 stated he/she knew the incident on the next day that R1 eloped from the facility. S2 stated during the incident, staff S1, another staff S3, Administrator and licensee were at the facility. S2 stated police officers brought R1 back to the facility.
LPA interviewed licensee (LCN). LCN stated on 5/21/2024, he/she was working/cleaning at the backyard. LCN stated around 12:30PM the police officers brought R1 back to the facility.
LPA reviewed R1's IPP dated 6/08/2023, page 5, it specifies R1 has a history of wandering/AWOL behavior. LPA reviewed R1's physician report dated 1/24/2024, it specifies R1's cognitive abilities are in a conditional state between normal aging and cognitive impairment, and R1 has history of AWOL.
LPA reviewed R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 5/10/2024, it specifies R1 needs to desist from leaving the facility without notice at all times, day and night. R1 needs to be supervised at all time.
Based on the interviews and records reviewed, the facility did not report R1's elopement incident to CCL office, the facility did not ensure resident R1 received supervision to meet R1's care need.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on documents reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the Department found the above allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Citations were noted today. Please see LIC9099-D. Appeal right was provided. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. A copy of the report was provide to ADM.
Page 3 of 3. |