1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3 of 3
Amended report
On 10/31/2025, at approximately 0951 hours, R1 was brought to the Emergency Department (ED) from the facility by ambulance after becoming agitated and physically engaging with S1 while receiving his/her morning medication. R1 was diagnosed with a “minimally displaced nasal bone fracture, medical documentation determined that the fracture could have resulted from an unwitnessed fall, or from an altercation, because R1 noted that he/she was elbowed in the nose by S1. On 10/30/2025, R1 suffered an unwitnessed fall, staff called EMT’s, but since R1 was at baseline, R1s POA preferred R1 not to be transferred to the ED.
S2 has had training in handling critical incidents and is called when staff need assistance with resident who are having behavior in de-escalating techniques including redirecting agitated residents. S2 uses techniques like using a preferred activity to diffuse resident behavior. S2 stated that when a resident attempts to physically engage with staff the staff disengage and move residents nearby for safety and attempt to de-escalate the situation. S2 stated that after any incident the family is immediately notified as well as the Residents primary care physician. S2 stated that R1s behavior is triggered when R1 has nothing to do. S2 would give R1 daily tasks like pouring water into cups when handing out medication to residents to engage R1.
R2 stated that he/she had seen R1s recent behavior had become more aggressive. R2 stated that R1 on one occasion was seen pulling on S1s fingers and S1 was not able to pull away and R1 was out of control and had uncontrollable rage. R2 stated that he/she felt that staff did not overstep their boundaries with R1. R2 stated that R1 could possibly hurt him/herself due to the flailing arms and trying to hit staff.
Based on investigation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur.
This report was reviewed with Matthew Zahodne, and a copy of the report was provided. |