1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not maintain resident areas clean and orderly.” Based on interviews and observations, LPA observed that the facility was relatively clean and organized. LPA toured resident rooms which also appeared to be clean and orderly. No interviews revealed that the facility is kept unsanitary or that cleaning duties are neglected. Staff stated that, at times, they become busy or are behind schedule, but that they work together to accomplish cleaning tasks.
LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not seek timely medical attention for residents.” Based on interviews conducted that medical assistance had been sought out when facility staff found out about R1’s sores. Interviews indicated that facility policy is that when it is determined a resident needs emergency medical attention, the facility initiates emergency services. Staff made appointments to address R1’s sores. The Department was unable to determine through interviews and documentation if the facility failed to seek timely medical attention for R1.
LPA investigated the allegation, “Licensee does not ensure enough staff to meet residents needs.” Based on interviews and observations, evidence was not found to support that there were insufficient staff to meet the needs of resident identified care needs. Interviews indicated there are usually two staff working on each shift. LPA observed during multiple visits two staff members working at the facility during the time of the investigation.
LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff are not meeting resident bathing needs.” Based on interviews conducted, staff indicated that residents receive sufficient care with bathing, grooming, and hygiene. Staff interviews revealed that residents receive showers unless they refuse. If a resident refuses the staff will make several attempts to see if they want to shower.
Based on interviews conducted and observations, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Findings that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
|