1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | House manager stated that the physician had initially filled out NO to special diet on the LIC602 Physician's Report. A family member then took the Physician’s Report back to R1’s doctor and the doctor changed the form rather than filling out a new form. The date that the doctor made this change is unknown.
LPA reviewed a black and white photograph with three bowls, one containing cubed vegetables, the second contains beans, and the third contains an unknown substance. There are handwritten notes in the margins that state “When giving R1 meals they need resemble this picture. She always needs a main, a side, and a veg. R1 can eat soft foods whole like the beans and mixed veggies. Per family members.” The photograph is dated 01/05/2022.
House manager stated that she and a family member made the meal together as an example of what R1 should eat and the house manager took a photograph and made the notes.
It was determined that even though the family indicated that it was OK for R1 to have a soft diet the facility always has to follow the LIC602 Physicians Report that prescribes the required diet for the resident. LPA requested the LIC602 Physician’s report from the facility three times and all copies that were provided to LPA by the facility indicate that R1 requires a pureed diet. RN witnessed staff giving R1 soft food which is not the prescribed diet for R1. The allegation is substantiated.
Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted and the report was emailed to house manager Lindsey Domereis, and administrator Melissa Johnson.
|