1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Due to staff neglect, resident was left to lye in feces for an extended period of time.
It was reported that the resident was found with dried feces and a rash on lower extremities.
During the interview process S4 stated I have witnessed poo left on the residents, but not sure if it was R1. S2 stated it should have been recorded in the care note for that day, when R1 was toileted. S3 stated one time I witnessed that R1 was soiled, and I could tell it had been for quite a while. S2 stated yes, I heard about this from another staff, saying family complained and we need to check R1 every hour or two. S4 stated hospice residents should be checked every 30 minutes when they are at end of life. S7 stated I would come to work in the morning and R1 was soiled with feces was dried on, R1’s sheets would be soaked and the place smelled. S7 stated it happened numerous times and I reported it to my supervisor.
The residents care plan states R1 is incontinent of bowels and needs to be checked throughout the shift for any bowel movements. LPA was unable to perform record reviews for BMs as the facility is unable to provide the BM records. Substantiated.
Based on investigation observations, record review(s) and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and exit interview conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed.
|