1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099-C
During the course of the investigation, LPAs interviewed center director (CD) Nikita Wallace, assistant director (AD), 6 staff (S1-S5 & S7), made observations, obtained documents and conducted record review from 11/20/25 through 02/11/26. LPA attempted to interview S6 and two staff S4 & S7 were not working on the date of incident. CD stated S1 provided two different versions of the incident, child 1 (C1) fell forward on cot while getting onto the cot, hitting face and left eye and that C1 fell off the cot hitting his left eye. S1 denied a child had visible injuries from an incident and in a follow up interview stated C1 was running around the classroom and tripped, fell on the floor by the shelf. S4 stated S1 communicated, “C1 fell off the bed and hit their eye when C1 and another child were fitting.” AD, S1-S3 & S5 stated they did not witness C1’s incident that caused injuries, however, they did see C1 with a black eye. CD stated there was no incident report written regarding C1’s eye injury. S1 denied not writing an incident report to a parent. S2 stated, the day following C1’s incident, S1 and S2, both wrote C1’s incident report; S1's date and time on the incident report was documented as the day after C1’s incident occurred and S2's date and time on the incident report was for the day of C1’s incident occurred, furthermore, both incident reports had different dates and times, were incomplete and not signed by CD or parent. S3 stated that, "Whenever I am in the toddler classroom at the end of the day, there are never incidents that are written or staff does not know what happened when I ask." S5 stated, "There was no record of a write up incident and the other teachers had no idea what happened." CD, AD and S1-S5 interviews and LPAs documents obtained corroborate the incidents as alleged.
Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted, documents obtained and record review(s), the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is determined to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed with the Assistant Director, Nakia Orlando.
The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days. |