1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The licensee stated that corporal punishment, including spanking or any other forms of physical discipline, is never used at the facility. She explained that the facility’s primary methods of discipline focus on teaching appropriate behavior through positive guidance. According to the licensee, these methods include age-appropriate time-outs, which provide children with a brief period to calm down and reflect on their behavior, as well as redirection, which involves guiding children toward alternative, constructive activities when they exhibit inappropriate behavior. The licensee also emphasized that all disciplinary actions are tailored to the child’s developmental level and are intended to promote learning, self-control, and respect for others.
Under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, each child receiving services from a family child care home must be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, including but not limited to interference with eating, sleeping, or toileting, or withholding shelter, clothing, medication, or aids to physical functioning. These rights cannot be waived or abridged by the licensee regardless of consent or authorization from the child’s authorized representative. Based on the licensee’s own admission on December 5, 2025, she acknowledged using the back scratcher as a threat to influence children’s behavior.
During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members (S1–S2) on December 5, 2025. Additional interviews were conducted with daycare children, clients, and other adults familiar with the facility. The staff members interviewed reported that they have never observed the licensee using a back scratcher as a form of discipline or to threaten any child, nor have they observed the licensee or any other adult at the facility hitting or roughly handling a child. Staff further indicated that they understand their responsibilities as mandated reporters and are aware of their legal obligation to report any facts or circumstances that lead them to suspect child abuse or neglect.
Interviews with daycare children, clients, and other adults did not yield any information supporting the allegation. Additionally, during both the LPA’s initial visit and the subsequent follow-up inspection, no evidence of personal rights violations was observed. Children in care appeared to be treated with dignity and respect in their interactions with staff and others, and were provided with safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment.
Based on the licensee’s own admission, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed with the licensee, Adrienne Mack. The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days. |