1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | L1 denied the allegation, stating that there is a musty smell when you open the cupboard in the bathroom in the infants room, but no mold. L1 stated that there was a leak in the toilet, so they had to pull the sink out because they could not find the pipe for the toilet. L1 stated that her husband hired a person to do the work, and does not have an invoice at this time, but stated that there was never any mention of mold from the person who did the work.
One staff interviewed, stated that the sink in the infant bathroom was replaced over the weekend of 10/25 - 10/26; stating that during the week prior, the wall where the old sink was located was exposed. The staff reported observing the wall to be black and spotty. The staff did not have information about who did the work. The staff stated that the bathroom was blocked off with a child safety gate, so the children did not have access. The other staff corroborated the first staff’s statement about observing the mold, but the date of the repair varied, stating that the wall was exposed the last week of September.
Parents (A1-A6) did not have any information about mold being present in the facility and reported that they never smelled a musty odor in the classroom.
During today's visit, L1 provided an invoice of work completed in the infant bathroom beginning 10/11/25, stating that sheet rock was removed, given 72 hours to dry and replaced with new sheet rock. Nothing about mold was included in the invoice.
Based on evidence collected during the complaint investigation there is not a preponderance of evidence that a violation has occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that an alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. |